Income after taxes or net income
DI= Gross Income - taxes
2 choices
With disposable income, households can either
-Consume (spend money on goods and services)
-Save (not spend money on goods and services)
Consumption
Household spending
The ability to consume is constrained by
-the amount of disposable income
-the propensity to save
Do households consume if DI=0?
-Autonomous consumption
-Dissaving
APC=C/DI=% DI that is spent
SAVING
Household NOT spending
The ability to save is constrained by
-the amount of disposable income
The propensity to consume
Do households save if DI=0?
-NO
APS= S/ DI= % DI that is not spent
APC& APS
APC+APS=1
1-APC= APS
1-APS= APC
APC> 1.: Dissaving
-APS.: Dissaving
Marginal propensity to Consume
-CHANGE IN C/CHANGE IN DI
-% of every extra dollar earned that is spent
Marginal propensity to Save
-CHANGE IN s/CHANGE IN DI
-% of every extra dollar earned that is saved
Mpc+mps=1
1-mpc=mps
The spending multiplier effect
An initial change in spending causes a larger change in aggregate spending or aggregate demand
Multiplier= Change in AD/ Change in spending
Multiplier = change in AD: change in c,i, g, Xn
Why does this happen?
Expenditures and income flow continuously which sets odds spending increase in the economy.
The spending multiplier cans be calculated from the mpc of the mps
Multiplier = 1/1-MPC or 1/MPS
Multipliers are positive when there is an increase in spending and negative when there is a decrease
Small changes in expenditure are examined by the multiplier effect.
When the government taxes the multiplier works in reverse
Why?
Because now money is leaving the circular flow
Tax multiplier (it's negative)
•=-MPC/1-MPC or -MPC/ MPS
If there is a tax cut, then the multiplier is positive because there is now more money in the circular flow
I really like how you have highlighted important information such as formulas that we need to memorize. The information is very insightful. A good idea would be adding how to solve for changes in GDP using the spending multiplier and government spending. Other than that, good job! :)
ReplyDelete